**Horizons** arise from causality, and delimit any observer’s zone of ‘vision’ (past and future). They are dependent on the observer’s position.

**Particle horizon **encloses all the particles an observer could have seen at the present time

Co-ordinate distance travelled by a light ray from the beginning of the universe up to a time t:

Physical distance:

This is the maximum straight-line distance which could have been travelled by a light ray since t=0 (i.e *d _{p}* is the radius of a sphere enclosing all the other particles that could have been seen.

*d*is the

_{p}(t)**particle horizon distance**.

**Event horizon** encloses all parts of the universe which in principle can be reached (although in practice it could take a while to get there).

**Copernican principle: **the universe is the same whoever and wherever you are. Obviously this is not exact, but it holds better on increasingly larger scales.

**Homogeneity and isotropy:**

- Homogeneity: the universe looks the same at every point.
- Isotropy: the universe looks the same in all directions- there is no need to invoke any centre of the expansion.

Note: homogeneity does not imply isotropy.

**Friedmann equation** (non rigorous derivation). This equation describes the expansion of the universe.

Method: find kinetic and gravitational potential energy of a test particle in a uniform expanding medium with mass density ρ- then use conservation of energy.

As the universe is homogeneous, we can take any point as the centre. The test particle has mass *m*, and from Gauss’ Law, only feels a force from the material at smaller radii.

Mass of force-exerting material

Force:

GPE:

KE:

Energy conservation U=T+V

U is a constant for a particular particle (not necessarily the same for particles at different *r*).

Multiply by

Put where *k* is curvature (see later).

This is the Friedmann equation.

**The fluid equation: **now we need to describe the density ρ of material in the universe, and how it evolves. Consider a volume V with unit co-moving radius (so *r=a*).

Energy:

First Law of Thermodynamics

For a reversible expansion *dS*=0

So:

This is the fluid equation.

**Dust: **cold, non-relativistic matter which exerts negligible pressure (*p*=0).

**Radiation: **light has pressure

These are the two equations of state we will need for the next section.

**For a dust dominated universe**, solve the fluid equation for the dust equation of state.

Density falls off in proportion to volume- not unreasonablr.

Coefficient of proportionality:

Remember, when *t*=0, *a=*0, and *a _{0}=*1 by convention.

Substitute into the Friedmann equation with *k*=0.

To solve, either-

Try:

Equate powers of t:

or-

Full solution:

In this solution, the universe continues to expand forever, but the rate of expansion becomes infinitely slow with time.

**For a radiation dominated universe**, the fluid equation now becomes-

Friedmann equation

To solve, either-

Try:

Equate powers of t:

or-

Full solution:

Universe still expands forever, just more slowly.

Note here that – an extra power is picked up here because the wavelength is stretched by the scale factor.

**Mixture: **total density

We can solve the equations exactly for a mixture, but to get a feel for what is actually going on, consider the long-term evolution of a universe where one or the other dominates.

If radiation dominates:

Density of dust falls off more slowly and will come to dominate.

If dust dominates:

Dust remains dominant.

**Matter-radiation equality**

As dust comes to dominate, the expansion rate speeds up from to .

**Destiny of the Universe: **For the expansion of the universe to stop, we need the Hubble Parameter H=0.

**If k=0:**in this case, the Universe expands forever, although the expansion is continually slowing down. This is known as a flat, Euclidean universe.**If k<0:**go back to the Friedmann equation:

In a dust-dominated universe, the first term on the RHS , so the second term will eventually dominate.

Expansion becomes faster, velocity becomes a constant -> free expansion.

**If k>0:**H can now be zero if the RHS terms in the Friedmann equation cancel. At large times, the second RHS term dominates, but is now negative; because gravitational attraction will still persist, collapse is inevitable (the Big Crunch).

**Scale factor vs. time**

**Density parameter and critical density: **once again, we go back to the Friedmann equation.

For a given value of H, there is a special value of the density which would mean *k*=0 (flat universe). This is known as the critical density, *ρ _{c}*, given by:

If *ρ _{c}* exceeds this, k>0 and the Big Crunch is inevitable.

The density parameter, is just a way of quoting densities in terms of the critical density.

**The cosmological constant: **we can introduce a new term into the Friedmann equation.

where *Λ* is the cosmological constant. Thismay be thought of as representing a zero-point or vacuum energy, or perhaps even ‘dark energy’.

**Matter contribution to the density parameter, Ω_{M}:** this is not easy to measure.

- First, count stars-
*Ω*=0.005 -> 0.01_{stars} - Cold gas content- as well as stars, there is also cold gas which has failed to form stars, and low-mass non-luminous stars (‘Jupiters’). Light element abundances and nucleosynthesis models give 0.01<
*Ω*<0.04._{M} - Galaxy rotation curves- as we saw earlier, velocities in galaxies do not fall off as . This suggests that galaxies are embedded in halos of dark matter, with
*Ω*~0.1._{M} - Bulk flows- the motions of galaxies relative to one another appears to suggest that
*Ω*~0.3._{M}

By considering all these things, we can get *Ω _{M }*up to 0.3, but analyses of CMB anisotropy suggest that the universe is flat, so in fact it should be close to 1. How can we reconcile this inconsistency?

** Ω_{Λ}: **if we introduce a cosmological constant, then-

(note that *a ^{2}H^{2} *is sometimes called

*–Ω*).

_{k}So now, for a flat universe-

Evidence for the existence of a cosmological constant is provided by Type IA supernovae, which act as **standard candles**.

**Age of the universe (t _{0}) **is defined to be the time elapsed since the scale factor

*a*was zero, but in some cosmological models,

*a*was never zero- these models are said to be without a big bang. We can use the Friedmann equation to find the age of the universe if we know the dust content, radiation content and cosmological constant (a walk in the park, then…).

**Fundamental cosmological parameters: **by these, we mean *H*, *Ω _{M }*and

*Ω*.

_{Λ}**The Hubble time: **remember, Hubble’s Law says that *v=H _{0}r*; remembering that speed=distance/time, and ignoring the fact that H is not a constant in time, the age of the universe is roughly

*H*(10-20 billion years). This is the Hubble time.

_{0}^{-1}If the expansion of the Universe proceeded at a constant rate, then the Hubble time would be precisely equal to the age of the universe, *t _{0}*. In fact, this would only be true in a completely empty universe which did not contain any matter to cause gravitational deceleration (in which case there would be no one there to care about the age or geometry of the universe anyway).

**Time scale for a flat, dust dominated universe: **remember and , so .

This is shorter than the Hubble time by a factor of 2/3.

**Ages and cosmological models**

t_{0} is now.

Closed universe- Big Crunch occurs at 2t_{max}.

t=0 occurs at different times in the past for different models.

**How long until the Big Crunch?: **We begin, once again, with the Friedmann equation.

For a closed universe, k=+1.

Because the expansion is reversible, *a _{max}* is the mid-point of this universe’s lifetime (i.e. when ). At this point-

Volume of a closed universe:

Density:

Now find the time taken to reach *a _{max}*.

Substitute using and integrate from 0 to *a _{max}*.

Let

When *a=*0,

When *a=a _{max}* (first time we reach this is at

*θ=*0).

Substitute all this in to get-

Time to Big Crunch =2*t _{max}*

**Redshift and time: **for an Einstein-de Sitter universe with *Ω _{M}*=1 and

*Ω*=0, objects at redshift 4 tell us about the universe when it was 10% of its current age and redshift 5 about when it was 5% of its current age. Since 1996, galaxies at redshifts 4.4, 4.92, 5.4 and 6.7 have been discovered, so we have a high lookback time for those objects.

_{Λ}**Our light cone**

Proper time (invariant interval)

: time-like- information can reach here from O (the origin).

: light-like, “null” interval.

: space-like- information cannot reach here from O.

Note that the sign of can be the other way- it’s just a convention, and one that even my lecturers differed on.

**The flatness problem: **the universe has *Ω *~ critical density, i.e. it is close to flat. Remember that

from the Friedmann equation.

so if *Ω*=1 then the LHS goes to zero and remains zero for all time (so *Ω*=1 forever)- but what’s going on on the RHS?

For a dust-dominated universe,

For a radiation-dominated universe,

neglecting curvature

Hubble parameter

so for dust-dominated

and for radiation-dominated

Going back to the Friedmann equation

for dust

for radiation

So *Ω*-1 is a function of time; we would not expect *Ω*~1 to be the case for all time, unless the universe was very, very close to flat since the beginning.

Alternative approach- dust term ~

-radiation ~

-curvature ~

For curvature not to dominate at large t, it must have previously been very small compared to other terms.

In terms of numbers, *t _{0}*~10

^{17 }sec

At recombination, *t*~10^{13} sec,

At matter-radiation equality, *t*~10^{10} sec,

At nucleosynthesis, *t*~1 sec,

This seems like quite a restrictive limit- any little fluctuation and the universe would be very different. This is the **flatness problem**.